The Integrator Blog
Home
Share |
about
Contact Me, Experience, Mission, Sabbatical in Central America, plus
Editorial Advisory Board
Columnists
Michael Levin
Taylor Walsh
background resources in PDF
Insurance, Integrative Clinics, Industry Summit Reports, News Files '99-'04
some organization links
Professions, Academia, Research, Policy
some CAM/IM publication links
Electronic, Peer-Reviewed, Blogs, More
Bradly Jacobs, MD, MPH, Revolution Health Blog
supported conference
Institute for Health & Productivity Management - Integrative/Complementary Healthcare
AER Follow-up: Interview with Former Harkin Chief of Staff Peter Reinecke PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Weeks   

Follow-up on the Adverse Events Reporting Law: Interview with Former Harkin Chief of Staff Peter Reinecke

Summary: First as chief of staff for US Senator Tom Harkin and then as a lobbyist associated with Pharmavite and United Natural Products Alliance, Peter Reinecke was present at the conception and passage of the adverse events reporting (AER) bill for the dietary supplement industry. After the AER bill passed (see related article), the Integrator contacted Reinecke for a brief report on the process, the opposition and the meaning of the AER.
Send your comments to
for posting in a future Your Comments article.

Peter Reinecke recalls that the work on an adverse events reporting (AER) bill for the dietary supplement industry began back in late 2004. The two-year process, though still lacking a signature the man who lost Florida in 2000, came to an end at 3:09 AM Saturday morning, December 9, when the US House of Representatives passed the bill, formally called the
Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug and Consumer Protection Act as their last act. (See related Integrator article.)

Image
Peter Reinecke
Reinecke was present at both ends of the process. In 2004, he was chief of staff for US Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA). With Harkin, he had been deeply involved with the development and passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) in the early 1990s. Last week he was up late on behalf of two clients, the United Natural Products Alliance (UNPA) and Pharmavite, a natural products firm. The Integrator caught up with Reinecke for a short interview on Tuesday, December 12, 2006.

Integrator: So what is your sense of the value of the AER law?

Reinecke: This is an important and needed bill that's good for consumers and wilkl help boost confidence in the industry. It should have happened a long time ago.

Integrator:  What were the principal changes, if any, as the bill developed and the lobbying continued.

Reinecke: The changes were more tweaking than substance. The final bill took into account the concern of some that we would see false reporting of adverse events being filed by (a company's) competitors. The bill that passed makes knowingly filing a false report a violation of the law.

Integrator:  Given the kinds of things we've seen from some industry members, this was likely a good addition. There was opposition from some parts of the industry I understand. Who was it? How would you characterize the opposition?

Reinecke:  There was a very small but very active group.  These efforts tended to be from people who have real misgivings about the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and how they might use the information. I recall Julian Whitaker, MD, and Jerry Kessler (founder of supplement firm Nature's Plus) and Nutraceuticals, a firm out of Salt Lake. Some had a line of argument that causality had to be shown before a report could be filed.

Integrator: That's good. Have we positively shown causality between smoking and lung cancer yet? One of the others is the American Association for Health Freedom, which has done some good work through the years, and whose executive director I interviewed prior to my earlier article. The note I received from Loren Israelson (executive director of UNPA) mentioned that a group of conservative Republicans were opposed to the bill at the end - 94 Republicans voted against. What was the thinking?

Reinecke: My sense was that for the vast majority of the members they didn't really have a chance to focus on what they were voting about until the moment of voting and some didn't have a good understanding. There were some comments made by two Republicans, early, against the bill, that this amounted to excessive government regulation. This is probably behind (the "no" votes).

Integrator: So, you are on your own now. Are you full-time lobbying? What are you up to?

Reinecke: I didn't leave my job (with US Senator Harkin) because I didn't like it. I left it because I was tired of 80-hour work weeks. I've got a new baby. I've been giving advice on both supplement and CAM things. I'm helping the NIH start a new consumer-oriented magazine. I'm also doing some work for the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. Then there's a big chunk of free advice I give to various friends and colleagues.  

Integrator: Well, that's nice. I know you've been helpful to the Consortium of Academic Health Centers for Integrative Medicine. I'll keep this in mind when colleagues and I are working under our policy hats!


Comment:
We all owe Reinecke thanks for his many years of good work, of 80-hour weeks with US Senator Harkin, and since, which have helped lay a foundation for the better participation of natural health practitioners and products in US health care. The interview, alas, ended with the Integrator taking up additional time from Reinecke to suggest he start planning now to take his new baby, once grown to 5-10 years, on a nice little working sabbatical, say Central America ...

Send your comments to
for posting in a future Your Comments article.



< Prev   Next >
Search
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sponsors
Integrative Practitioner
The Westreich Foundation
voluntary contributions
Support the work!
Archive
All Integrator Round-ups
Integrator Top 10 Lists 2006-2015
Issues #140-#142 Oct-Dec 2015
Issues #137-#139 July-Sept 2015
Issues #134-#136 April-June 2015
Issues #131-#133 Jan-March 2015
Issues #127-#130 Sept-Dec 2014
Issues #123-#126 May-Aug 2014
Issues#119-#122 Jan-April 2014
Issues #116-#118 - Oct-Dec 2013
Issues #113-#115 July-Sept 2013
Issues #110-#112 April-June 2013
Issues #108-#109 Jan-March 2013
Issue #105-#107 Oct-Dec 2012
Issues #102-#104 - July-Sept 2012
Issues #99-#101 - April-June 2012
Issues #96-#98-Jan-March 2012
Issues #94-#95 Nov-Dec 2011
Issues #92-#93 Sept-Oct 2011
Issues #90 and #91 - July-Aug 2011
Issues #88 and #89 - May-June 2011
Issues #86 and #87 - March-April 2011
Issues #84 and #85 - Jan-Feb 2011
Issues #82 and #83 - Nov-Dec 2010
Issues #80 & #81 - Sept Oct 2010
Issues #78 & #79 - July August 2010
Issues #76 & #77 - May June 2010
Issues #74 & #75 - March-April 2010
Issues #73 & #73 - Jan-Feb 2010
Issues #69, #70 & #71 - Nov-Dec 2009
Issues #67 and #68 - Sept-Oct 2009
Issues #65 and #66 - July-August 2009
Issues #63-#64 - May-June 2009
Issues #60-#62 - March-April 2009
Issues #57-#59 - Jan-Feb 2009
Issues #55-#56 - Nov-Dec 2008
Issues #51-#54 - Sept-Oct 2008
Issues #47-#50 - July-August 2008
Issues #46 & -#47 - May-June 2008
Issues #43-#45 Mar-April 2008
Issues #41 & #42 - Feb 2008
Issues #39 & #40 - Dec-Jan '08
Issues #37 & #38 - Nov 2007
Issues #35 & #36 - Oct 2007
Issues #33 & #34 - Sept 2007
Issues #30-#32 - July-Aug 2007
Issues #28 & #29 - June 2007
Issues #26 and #27 - May 2007
Issue #25 - April 2007
Issues # 23 & #24 - March 2007
Issues #21 and #22 - Feb 2007
Issues #19 and & 20 - Jan 2007
Issues #17 and #18 - Dec 2006
Issues #15 and #16 - Nov 2006
Issues #13 and #14 - Oct 2006
Issues #11 and #12- Sept 2006
Issues #9 and #10 - Aug 2006
Issues #7 and #8 - July 2006
Issues #5 and #6 - June 2006
Issues #3 and #4 - May 2006
Issues #1 and #2 - April 2006
All Articles by Subject: 2006
All Articles by Subject: Jan-June 2007
IAYT-Sponsored Series on the Future of Yoga Therapy