The Integrator Blog
Home
Share |
about
Contact Me, Experience, Mission, Sabbatical in Central America, plus
Editorial Advisory Board
Columnists
Michael Levin
Taylor Walsh
background resources in PDF
Insurance, Integrative Clinics, Industry Summit Reports, News Files '99-'04
some organization links
Professions, Academia, Research, Policy
some CAM/IM publication links
Electronic, Peer-Reviewed, Blogs, More
Bradly Jacobs, MD, MPH, Revolution Health Blog
supported conference
Institute for Health & Productivity Management - Integrative/Complementary Healthcare
Washington Healthcare Poll Finds 75% of Voters Want Licensed DCs, LAcs, NDs, in Basic Benefits PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Weeks   

Washington Healthcare Poll Finds 75% of Voters Want Licensed  DCs, LAcs, NDs, in Basic Benefits

Summary: We know from a CodeBlueNow! Pulse survey that 69% of voters in red state Iowa think licensed practitioners like chiropractors, acupuncturists and naturopathic physicians should be included in basic benefits. Now a follow-up survey, using the same questions, which CodeBlueNow! commissioned from Gilmore research, we learn that 75% of blue state Washington State voters also want these complementary and integrative medicine practitioners included. The question CBN's CEO Kathleen O'Connor asks is: Why are the presidential candidates are not reflecting this public opinion?
Send your comments to
for inclusion in a future Your Comments Forum.

health reform, voters, CAM, integrative medicine, chiropractors, naturopaths
Sponsor of the two health reform voter surveys
"Once again the public chimes in on having coverage for everyone, a basic benefit focusing on prevention, and wanting the ability to see any licensed provider if they are licensed by their state." So states Kathleen O'Connor, founder and CEO of CodeBlueNow! a national not-for-profit organization which commissioned the survey of roughly 600 Washington voters.

The survey covered a range of topics to discover voter opinion on health reform issues. These included payment strategies, which stakeholders are trusted, whether coverage should be universal, whether they would pay to have their neighbors covered. One question related to inclusion of licensed complementary and alternative medicine practitioners in basic benefits.

______________________________

Iowa Voter Perceptions of the Importance of
Including Licensed CAM Practitioners
in Basic Benefits

"Note your level of agreement
or disagreement with
this statement ..."
 Agree
(4,5)
 Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(1,2)
Don't
Know
  Mean   
Basic health benefits should include
coverage for any licensed health care
professional, such as naturopathic
physicians, acupuncturists and
chiropractors, as long as they are
certified and licensed by the state
and by their profession.






 
Iowa Survey (10/2007)
 68% 19%
11%
1%

3.97
 
Washington Survey (01/2008)
 75%  14%  10% 1%    4.07   
               

Both surveys by Gilmore Research Group for CodeBlueNow!
_____________________________

The "once again" in O'Connor's statement refers to an earlier CBN survey of Iowa voters, reported in the Integrator ("Iowa Health Reform Poll: 68% of Voters Want Licensed CAM Professionals Covered in Basic Benefits," October 8, 2007). I asked O'Connor for her views on this topic. She wrote via email:
"The second CodeBlueNow! Pulse in Washington state was a mirror image of the Iowa survey last summer. The only statement that had a statistically significant difference in response between the two states was that regarding inclusion of all types of licensed practitioners. In Iowa, 69% of the voters surveyed agreed with that statement. In Washington, it was 75%."
Image
Kathleen O'Connor, CBN's founder and CEO
O'Connor notes that while the surveys in the two states show a "remarkable congruence" it is intriguing that presidential candidates are not addressing the CAM issue.

“These responses show a remarkable congruence on some key issues across party lines. We see strong consensus on covering everyone, and including CAM providers. What is striking in these findings is how little all the candidates are addressing some very key concerns of the voters. None, for example, address CAM in their health care proposals. “  
Following the Washington survey, CodeBlueNow! asked Gilmore Research, which carried out the surveys, to provide a comparison report. That fascinating evidence of alignment between citizen views in a red state and blue state is available by clicking here. O'Connor and her CodeBlueNow! team then compared findings with candidate statements. That analysis is available here.

Curious to participate in the CodeBlueNow! Pulse survey? It's available on the CBN site. You can be part of a third, uncontrolled set of respondents. It's an interesting instrument.

Disclosure: For the past 8 months I have served on the CBN board of directors.

Comment
: One fascinating happenstance of CBN choosing Iowa, for its political importance, and Washington, as its home state, for the surveys, is that the organization chose two states which have been powerfully important for two of the licensed CAM disciplines.

Iowa, the home of Palmer College, has a significant base of chiropractic practitioners through influence for a century. Chiropractic is already widely included in benefits, if for a limited number of visits or conditions. Washington is the home of Bastyr University and, with Oregon, is the base of the rejuvenation of the naturopathic medical profession. Washington has also had strong acupuncture and Oriental medicine and massage therapy schools. Since 1995, the state has required all insurers to include "every category of (licensed) provider."

One minor conclusion: A decade of experience with such coverage in Washington State doesn't appear to have dissuaded voters from wanting it in a standard benefit!

Send your comments to
for inclusion in a future Your Comments Forum.


< Prev   Next >
Search
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sponsors
Integrative Practitioner
The Westreich Foundation
voluntary contributions
Support the work!
Archive
All Integrator Round-ups
Integrator Top 10 Lists 2006-2015
Issues #140-#142 Oct-Dec 2015
Issues #137-#139 July-Sept 2015
Issues #134-#136 April-June 2015
Issues #131-#133 Jan-March 2015
Issues #127-#130 Sept-Dec 2014
Issues #123-#126 May-Aug 2014
Issues#119-#122 Jan-April 2014
Issues #116-#118 - Oct-Dec 2013
Issues #113-#115 July-Sept 2013
Issues #110-#112 April-June 2013
Issues #108-#109 Jan-March 2013
Issue #105-#107 Oct-Dec 2012
Issues #102-#104 - July-Sept 2012
Issues #99-#101 - April-June 2012
Issues #96-#98-Jan-March 2012
Issues #94-#95 Nov-Dec 2011
Issues #92-#93 Sept-Oct 2011
Issues #90 and #91 - July-Aug 2011
Issues #88 and #89 - May-June 2011
Issues #86 and #87 - March-April 2011
Issues #84 and #85 - Jan-Feb 2011
Issues #82 and #83 - Nov-Dec 2010
Issues #80 & #81 - Sept Oct 2010
Issues #78 & #79 - July August 2010
Issues #76 & #77 - May June 2010
Issues #74 & #75 - March-April 2010
Issues #73 & #73 - Jan-Feb 2010
Issues #69, #70 & #71 - Nov-Dec 2009
Issues #67 and #68 - Sept-Oct 2009
Issues #65 and #66 - July-August 2009
Issues #63-#64 - May-June 2009
Issues #60-#62 - March-April 2009
Issues #57-#59 - Jan-Feb 2009
Issues #55-#56 - Nov-Dec 2008
Issues #51-#54 - Sept-Oct 2008
Issues #47-#50 - July-August 2008
Issues #46 & -#47 - May-June 2008
Issues #43-#45 Mar-April 2008
Issues #41 & #42 - Feb 2008
Issues #39 & #40 - Dec-Jan '08
Issues #37 & #38 - Nov 2007
Issues #35 & #36 - Oct 2007
Issues #33 & #34 - Sept 2007
Issues #30-#32 - July-Aug 2007
Issues #28 & #29 - June 2007
Issues #26 and #27 - May 2007
Issue #25 - April 2007
Issues # 23 & #24 - March 2007
Issues #21 and #22 - Feb 2007
Issues #19 and & 20 - Jan 2007
Issues #17 and #18 - Dec 2006
Issues #15 and #16 - Nov 2006
Issues #13 and #14 - Oct 2006
Issues #11 and #12- Sept 2006
Issues #9 and #10 - Aug 2006
Issues #7 and #8 - July 2006
Issues #5 and #6 - June 2006
Issues #3 and #4 - May 2006
Issues #1 and #2 - April 2006
All Articles by Subject: 2006
All Articles by Subject: Jan-June 2007
IAYT-Sponsored Series on the Future of Yoga Therapy