The Integrator Blog
Home
Share |
about
Contact Me, Experience, Mission, Sabbatical in Central America, plus
Editorial Advisory Board
Columnists
Michael Levin
Taylor Walsh
background resources in PDF
Insurance, Integrative Clinics, Industry Summit Reports, News Files '99-'04
some organization links
Professions, Academia, Research, Policy
some CAM/IM publication links
Electronic, Peer-Reviewed, Blogs, More
Bradly Jacobs, MD, MPH, Revolution Health Blog
supported conference
Institute for Health & Productivity Management - Integrative/Complementary Healthcare
How the IOM-Bravewell Integrative Medicine Summit Could Make a Difference: A Proposed Action Plan PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Weeks   

How the IOM-Bravewell Integrative Medicine Summit Could Make a Difference: A Proposed Action Plan

Summary: Do you think the National Integrative Medicine Summit can make a difference?  Planning for this February 25-27, 2009 gathering, sponsored by a partnership of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies and the Bravewell Collaborative, is under way. I organize my recommended plan around areas where exploration of integrative practice could have a significant impact on the nation's medical crisis. The high notes are a health approach, outpatient services, the patient-centered medical home, respect for multiple disciplines, researching whole practices as basis for managing chronic disease, and whole cost accounting.  How do you think this Summit might create possibilities which the IOM's 2005 report didn't already open?
Send your comments to
for inclusion in a future Your Comments Forum.

Image
Sponsoring the Summit: Can the IOM recognize this as an opportunity to learn?
I wrote this article originally as my regular column for Integrative Practitioner Online, which published it here. I republish it, in full, to stimulate dialogue on how you think the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies would be best served to focus its energies in this National Summit on Integrative Medicine and Health of the Public. What questions do you think should be asked, or directions pursued? What do your think of the proposals I offer? Please send me your ideas. I'll make sure the IOM staff and at least some of the planners hear from you.

For a look at the IOM's 12-person planning team please see the related Integrator article
Institute of Medicine's Names Planners for Integrative Medicine Summit Named: Snyderman to Chair.
______________________________

An Action Plan for an IOM “Integrative Health Care Summit”

(first published here for at Integrative Practitioner Online - www.integrativepractitioner.com)

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences announced on March 11, 2008 that it will hold an National Summit on Integrative Medicine and Health of the Public on February 25-27, 2009.


One notes these things. The IOM is considered by many to be the brains of US medicine. It can be a potent influencer of government policy, research directions and foundation giving.

Among the most significant of IOM’s recent contributions has been leadership, if belated, in raising awareness and stimulating action on medical errors and medical deaths. [See To Err is Human (2000) and Crossing the Quality Chasm (2002)] But the IOM cannot be altogether proud of its track record if it is indeed the brains of our over $2 trillion system: by the IOM’s own accounting - and an authorship team that includes the Summit manager - between 1/3 and 1/2 of costs are for care that is wasteful and likely harmful. Either the IOM is not usually asking the right questions, or the brain’s messages are not being effectively translated into action by the corporate body of US research, payment and delivery.
 
That’s context. The IOM took a significant step into the complementary and alternative healthcare world 3 years ago when it published the 337-page Report on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States.  The volume considers many themes, has much good in it, and has certainly influenced some academic behavior. But the report appears to have had as limited an impact on the appropriate uptake of integrative health care as the IOM’s more typical business has had in shifting the disastrous direction of the broader medical system.

How, then, might this IOM Summit be, instead of a regurgitation of materials already published, of optimal value to our system in crisis? I suggest these useful directions.

Focus on health care, not medicine


Those involved in “integrative practice” assert a new paradigm of clinical care which focuses on healing and health creation in partnership with patients. A multidisciplinary consortium of complementary healthcare educators formally asserts the value in “recognizing the intimate relationship between health, mind, body, spirit and environment, and emphasizing health promotion, healing, prevention and wellness.”  The paradigm is actually an “alternative” to reductive and reactive medical models, not a “complementary” add-on. The IOM would set itself a more productive polestar if it valued this profound shift of culture and practice.  The focus of the Summit should be changed to “integrative health care” rather than “integrative medicine.” The Summit is an opportunity for the IOM to actively engage a health-oriented paradigm.

IOM, Summit, integrative medicine
Focus on all of the integrative disciplines, not just medical doctors


The integrative practice field involves many disciplines. Consumer use of mind-body, patient-centered practice is neither dominated by “medicine” (MDs) nor is most care delivered by MDs. Over 100,000 acupuncture and Oriental medicine practitioners, holistic nurses, chiropractors, naturopathic physicians and others deliver most of this new-paradigm care. Consumers create their own teams with various practitioners in central roles in different times. For the Summit to more deeply explore these other practices would be to respect the IOM’s own rubric from its 2005 Report:
 “… the goal of integrating care should be the provision of comprehensive care that is safe and effective, that is collaborative and interdisciplinary, and that respects and joins effective interventions from all sources.”
There is nothing in the rubric that says an MD should be in the center of the integrative universe, or that organizing this around an MD is more effective or cost effective.

Focus on the potential value in the outpatient, patient-centered medical home arena, not just on inpatient “complementary medicine”

Most integrative practitioners work in outpatient environments. Yet the “integration” dialogue has focused disproportionately on how to add “complementary therapies” to hospital and tertiary care. Yet we know that populations with more primary, outpatient care have better outcomes at lower cost than those in which consumers directly access specialists and subspecialists and thus fall under the sway of their predilections for often unnecessary surgeries and procedures. The “patient centered medical home” movement, led by family doctors, osteopaths, internists, pediatricians and community medicine practitioners focuses on optimizing outpatient care. This movement purports to be interdisciplinary and values collaboration, teams and community. This is the natural fit for incorporating integrative practitioners and therapies.  Can these disciplines advance the patient-centered medical home movement and thus help to right the gross imbalance toward inpatient care in our delivery structure? How might the outpatient movement gain by linking with these natural health care allies?

Explore how integrative practices can meet primary care needs


Despite what we know about the importance of primary care, the United States has an emerging, primary care shortage of huge proportions. Conventional medical schools are not turning out enough practitioners. The IOM team would be smart to focus on the ways the distinctly licensed complementary health care disciplines (DC, ND, AOM, direct entry midwifery) and holistic nursing and medical practices can help meet this societal need. We have models. Some states already include licensed natural health practitioners as part of their primary care mix. What special training, if any, should be required? In addition, do these integrative disciplines model a health-focused primary care practice which may have something to teach conventional primary care practices? Might the bio-psycho-social model benefit from integrative inputs?

Focus research questions on whole systems and whole practices for chronic conditions

Conventional chronic disease management already involves multiple inputs: pharmaceuticals, counseling, exercise, dietary advice, and etc. Integrative approaches and practitioners are similarly multi-agent, but with a shifted intent and an additional array of tools. The goal of such care is not to leave the whole practice of health creation for a magic bullet, but rather to partner with the patient in an ongoing way in health creation through the complexity and potential of patient-centered mind-body care.  The single agent placebo controlled randomized trial is not a gold standard in this environment; rather, it is too often an obstruction. The research community needs its own paradigm shift to support this practice shift to whole system, whole person chronic care. A great contribution from this Summit toward long-term resolution of our nation’s medical crisis would be to have this IOM effort jump into this challenging research arena with both feet. Research on all chronic care will benefit from the integrative care workshop.

Focus on economic outcomes using whole cost accounting

Given the current crisis, the IOM would serve us to focus on areas where integrative practice may provide care which also limits the direct and societal cost of poor health. This exploration should be speculative: discover best practices and extrapolate where cost savings might be gained through bringing health-focused approaches and practitioners into the care continuum. The IOM team should leave reductive analysis behind. Merely comparing medical cost to medical costs of a given intervention dismisses the more expensive, global costs associated with health. Included here are, for example, would be costs associated with adverse effects of conventional treatment as well as the cost savings, to an employer, for instance, that may come of from a patient-centered, integrative healthcare encounter. The IOM team should take a lead from the environmental movement and embrace whole cost accounting.


The IOM’s Summit process kicks off with a meeting of its 12 member planning team later this week.  The effort is being managed through its Forum on the Science of Health Care Quality Improvement and Implementation, directed by Samantha Chao, MPH and co-chaired by former US Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, MPA. This forum is charged with moving the system changes stimulated when the IOM courageously dropped the bomb on medical errors in 2000.


This agenda for the IOM Summit - openly exploring the potential contributions of all of the disciplines involved in new paradigm integrative practices – could be strategically useful as additional shock therapy. "CAM" is not, actually, "CAM." The acronym is a reductive label draped over myriad therapies and whole systems of care, many of which were modeling mind-body approaches long before medicine got on board. Maybe medicine has something to learn from these integrative practices on how to become "health care."


Send your comments to
for inclusion in a future Your Comments Forum.


 

< Prev   Next >
Search
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sponsors
Integrative Practitioner
The Westreich Foundation
voluntary contributions
Support the work!
Archive
All Integrator Round-ups
Integrator Top 10 Lists 2006-2015
Issues #140-#142 Oct-Dec 2015
Issues #137-#139 July-Sept 2015
Issues #134-#136 April-June 2015
Issues #131-#133 Jan-March 2015
Issues #127-#130 Sept-Dec 2014
Issues #123-#126 May-Aug 2014
Issues#119-#122 Jan-April 2014
Issues #116-#118 - Oct-Dec 2013
Issues #113-#115 July-Sept 2013
Issues #110-#112 April-June 2013
Issues #108-#109 Jan-March 2013
Issue #105-#107 Oct-Dec 2012
Issues #102-#104 - July-Sept 2012
Issues #99-#101 - April-June 2012
Issues #96-#98-Jan-March 2012
Issues #94-#95 Nov-Dec 2011
Issues #92-#93 Sept-Oct 2011
Issues #90 and #91 - July-Aug 2011
Issues #88 and #89 - May-June 2011
Issues #86 and #87 - March-April 2011
Issues #84 and #85 - Jan-Feb 2011
Issues #82 and #83 - Nov-Dec 2010
Issues #80 & #81 - Sept Oct 2010
Issues #78 & #79 - July August 2010
Issues #76 & #77 - May June 2010
Issues #74 & #75 - March-April 2010
Issues #73 & #73 - Jan-Feb 2010
Issues #69, #70 & #71 - Nov-Dec 2009
Issues #67 and #68 - Sept-Oct 2009
Issues #65 and #66 - July-August 2009
Issues #63-#64 - May-June 2009
Issues #60-#62 - March-April 2009
Issues #57-#59 - Jan-Feb 2009
Issues #55-#56 - Nov-Dec 2008
Issues #51-#54 - Sept-Oct 2008
Issues #47-#50 - July-August 2008
Issues #46 & -#47 - May-June 2008
Issues #43-#45 Mar-April 2008
Issues #41 & #42 - Feb 2008
Issues #39 & #40 - Dec-Jan '08
Issues #37 & #38 - Nov 2007
Issues #35 & #36 - Oct 2007
Issues #33 & #34 - Sept 2007
Issues #30-#32 - July-Aug 2007
Issues #28 & #29 - June 2007
Issues #26 and #27 - May 2007
Issue #25 - April 2007
Issues # 23 & #24 - March 2007
Issues #21 and #22 - Feb 2007
Issues #19 and & 20 - Jan 2007
Issues #17 and #18 - Dec 2006
Issues #15 and #16 - Nov 2006
Issues #13 and #14 - Oct 2006
Issues #11 and #12- Sept 2006
Issues #9 and #10 - Aug 2006
Issues #7 and #8 - July 2006
Issues #5 and #6 - June 2006
Issues #3 and #4 - May 2006
Issues #1 and #2 - April 2006
All Articles by Subject: 2006
All Articles by Subject: Jan-June 2007
IAYT-Sponsored Series on the Future of Yoga Therapy