The Integrator Blog
Home
Share |
about
Contact Me, Experience, Mission, Sabbatical in Central America, plus
Editorial Advisory Board
Columnists
Michael Levin
Taylor Walsh
background resources in PDF
Insurance, Integrative Clinics, Industry Summit Reports, News Files '99-'04
some organization links
Professions, Academia, Research, Policy
some CAM/IM publication links
Electronic, Peer-Reviewed, Blogs, More
Bradly Jacobs, MD, MPH, Revolution Health Blog
supported conference
Institute for Health & Productivity Management - Integrative/Complementary Healthcare
Alert: Comments Due on Essential Benefits (12/06) and CMS' Innocations/ACOs (12/03) PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Weeks   

Alert: Comments Due on Essential Health Benefits (12/06) and CMS "Innovations"/Accountable Care Organizations (12/03)

Summary: Readers inform that 2 additional comment deadlines are coming up on key health reform developments. Of most importance: What are processes in clarifying the "Essential Health Benefits" package under the new law? Will this reflect the non-discrimination language in Section 2706? Will historic, discriminatory practices prevail? The IOM seeks comment for this study requested by US Health & Human Services. Then, for those of you who wish to get integrative practice/medicine/CAM into thinking on Medicare "innovation" and Accountable Care Organizations (ACO), a comment period on preliminary standards for ACOs ends December 3, 2010. Here is summary background on each of these and information about how and where to respond. 
Send your comments to


The dream of a fully-staffed lobbying arm to continuously participate in policy-setting was never so present: 3 comment deadlines cluster together for the coming December 3-6 weekend. Readers recently informed me of the first two reported below. I then send a reminder of the
Integrator Alert on integrative health care in the Nation's Prevention Strategy sent November 15, 2010. Hopefully some of you will find time to respond and these agencies will hear from a few people from these communities. (If you like, share your comments with me and I will share them with Integrator readers.)


1.   IOM's Public Input on "Determination of Essential Health Benefits"


Image
Charged by HHS to set benefit guidelines
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has engaged a consensus study, at the request of the Secretary of US Department of Health and Human Services, to "make recommendations on the criteria and methods for determining and updating the essential health benefits package" for policies of Qualified Health Plans under the Affordable Hewalthcare Act. The IOM's notice and response information follow and can of Qualified Health Plans under the Affordable Hewalthcare Act. The IOM's notice can be directly viewed here.
"Activity Description

"The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed into law on March 23, 2010, will allow individuals and businesses to purchase health insurance directly through exchanges-competitive marketplaces where buyers can compare coverage. These exchanges will offer a choice of qualified health plans (QHPs) that vary in coverage levels but meet certain standards in categories of care and limits on patient cost sharing. The PPACA stipulates that these QHPs will cover the general categories of: ambulatory patient services; emergency services; hospitalization; maternity and newborn care; mental health and substance use disorder services including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management; and pediatric services including oral and vision care. Further details of an "essential health benefit" package are to be defined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) based on the scope of benefits offered by a typical employer plan. 

"At the request of the Secretary of HHS, the IOM is undertaking a study that will make recommendations on the criteria and methods for determining and updating the essential health benefits package. The IOM will not define specific service elements of the benefit package. Instead, the IOM will review how insurers determine covered benefits and medical necessity and will provide guidance on the policy principles and criteria for the Secretary to take into account when examining QHPs for appropriate balance among categories of care; the health care needs of diverse segments of the population; and nondiscrimination based on age, disability, or expected length of life. 

"Additionally, the IOM will offer advice on criteria and a process for periodically reviewing and updating the benefits package. To provide public comment, please use our online form . Please submit your comments by December 6 to ensure that your perspective and the evidence base you provide can be examined before the committee's first meeting."
 

2.   Accountable Care Organizations and CMS' Center for Innovation (ACOs)


Image
A reader with a government position (who for that reason chose to be anonymous) alerted me to this comment period. She wrote of her notes below: "I think some thoughtful comments could help to at least get IP/IH/CAM in the conversation." Here is her guidance.
"On November 17, CMS issued a notice inviting people to submit comments by December 3 that will be used in the development of regulations on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).  ACOs are groups of providers that will manage and coordinate the care of Medicare beneficiaries. If an ACO can demonstrate that it is able to reduce Medicare costs (e.g. by decreasing hospital admissions, emergency room use, etc.), the ACO will share in the cost savings. 

"Under the same request for information, CMS is also accepting comments on the new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), which was established to test innovative payment and service delivery models that improve quality of care and reduce costs. 


"Both the ACOs and the CMMI were established in Sections 3021 & 3022 of the Affordable Care Act to improve quality and lower costs by creating integrated health care delivery systems that are patient-centered and foster the participation of physicians and other clinicians in solo or small practices.

"While nothing here explicitly addresses Integrative Health Practitioners or Integrative Health Care, these initiatives are simply too big and too important to ignore.  ACOs are going to want to show that they have saved Medicare money through things such as fewer inpatient hospitalizations, ER visits, invasive procedures, visits to high priced specialists, etc. by the beneficiaries that are assigned to them. 

  • Shouldn't they be able to offer acupuncture, yoga, or any other CAM modality to patients? 
  • Even though most IPs would not be eligible to be part of the ACO and share directly in the cost savings, wouldn't it be helpful if the regulations specifically allowed, or even encouraged, the ACOs to include CAM as part of their strategy to improve quality and reduce cost? 
  • When the data is evaluated, wouldn't it be interesting if the ACO with a strong CAM component was successful in reducing costs and improving care?
  • Perhaps even more critical is to submit comments on how the CMMI is defining integrated health care delivery systems: Shouldn't they include all licensed health professionals in the health care delivery system, not just those currently recognized by Medicare? 
  • If CMS wants to tests new delivery models, shouldn't they look at some of the Integrative Clinics that are already providing a range of both conventional and CAM services?

"This is a rare opportunity to provide formal input on something when it is still in its developmental stage.  Even though most IPs are not Medicare providers, the new CNNI may have more flexibility to consider innovative approaches that improve quality of care and outcomes, and reduce overall costs, than any previous initiatives.  If nothing else, this is an opportunity to start a dialogue and educate the new leadership at CMS that Integrative Health is more than just conventional practitioners talking to each other, and could be an important component of changing the way health care is delivered and paid for."   

3.   Reminder: Comments on "Integrative Practitioners" in the Prevention & Wellness Strategy Due 12/5

Image
Surgeon General Benjamin: Comments sought on draft framework
An earlier Integrator alert noted that a comment period on the nation's emerging strategy for health promotion, prevention and wellness ends December 5, 2010.  This one is a critical important because "integrative practice" and integrative health care" are already inlaid in language in the Affordable Healthcare Act that established the new Prevention and Health Promotion Strategy.  Click here to directly access the Surgeon General's comment page on the subject.

_________________________________

Overall Comment: This process can feel overwhelming. Consider reviewing the 3, choosing one, clicking in, and having your say.  These are each significant opportunities for the innovation that is "integrative practice" to be seen and heard. Again, if you like, share your comments with me and I will share them with Integrator readers - anonymously or with attribution, your choice.

Send your comments to
for inclusion in a future Integrator.



< Prev   Next >
Search
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sponsors
Integrative Practitioner
The Westreich Foundation
voluntary contributions
Support the work!
Archive
All Integrator Round-ups
Integrator Top 10 Lists 2006-2015
Issues #140-#142 Oct-Dec 2015
Issues #137-#139 July-Sept 2015
Issues #134-#136 April-June 2015
Issues #131-#133 Jan-March 2015
Issues #127-#130 Sept-Dec 2014
Issues #123-#126 May-Aug 2014
Issues#119-#122 Jan-April 2014
Issues #116-#118 - Oct-Dec 2013
Issues #113-#115 July-Sept 2013
Issues #110-#112 April-June 2013
Issues #108-#109 Jan-March 2013
Issue #105-#107 Oct-Dec 2012
Issues #102-#104 - July-Sept 2012
Issues #99-#101 - April-June 2012
Issues #96-#98-Jan-March 2012
Issues #94-#95 Nov-Dec 2011
Issues #92-#93 Sept-Oct 2011
Issues #90 and #91 - July-Aug 2011
Issues #88 and #89 - May-June 2011
Issues #86 and #87 - March-April 2011
Issues #84 and #85 - Jan-Feb 2011
Issues #82 and #83 - Nov-Dec 2010
Issues #80 & #81 - Sept Oct 2010
Issues #78 & #79 - July August 2010
Issues #76 & #77 - May June 2010
Issues #74 & #75 - March-April 2010
Issues #73 & #73 - Jan-Feb 2010
Issues #69, #70 & #71 - Nov-Dec 2009
Issues #67 and #68 - Sept-Oct 2009
Issues #65 and #66 - July-August 2009
Issues #63-#64 - May-June 2009
Issues #60-#62 - March-April 2009
Issues #57-#59 - Jan-Feb 2009
Issues #55-#56 - Nov-Dec 2008
Issues #51-#54 - Sept-Oct 2008
Issues #47-#50 - July-August 2008
Issues #46 & -#47 - May-June 2008
Issues #43-#45 Mar-April 2008
Issues #41 & #42 - Feb 2008
Issues #39 & #40 - Dec-Jan '08
Issues #37 & #38 - Nov 2007
Issues #35 & #36 - Oct 2007
Issues #33 & #34 - Sept 2007
Issues #30-#32 - July-Aug 2007
Issues #28 & #29 - June 2007
Issues #26 and #27 - May 2007
Issue #25 - April 2007
Issues # 23 & #24 - March 2007
Issues #21 and #22 - Feb 2007
Issues #19 and & 20 - Jan 2007
Issues #17 and #18 - Dec 2006
Issues #15 and #16 - Nov 2006
Issues #13 and #14 - Oct 2006
Issues #11 and #12- Sept 2006
Issues #9 and #10 - Aug 2006
Issues #7 and #8 - July 2006
Issues #5 and #6 - June 2006
Issues #3 and #4 - May 2006
Issues #1 and #2 - April 2006
All Articles by Subject: 2006
All Articles by Subject: Jan-June 2007
IAYT-Sponsored Series on the Future of Yoga Therapy