The Integrator Blog
Share |
Contact Me, Experience, Mission, Sabbatical in Central America, plus
Editorial Advisory Board
Michael Levin
Taylor Walsh
background resources in PDF
Insurance, Integrative Clinics, Industry Summit Reports, News Files '99-'04
some organization links
Professions, Academia, Research, Policy
some CAM/IM publication links
Electronic, Peer-Reviewed, Blogs, More
Bradly Jacobs, MD, MPH, Revolution Health Blog
supported conference
Institute for Health & Productivity Management - Integrative/Complementary Healthcare
Rick Kirschner, Author of "Click!" on the Debate over the American Board of Integrative Medicine PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Weeks   

Rick Kirschner, Author of "Click!" on the Debate over ABIM and the MD's Integrative Medicine Specialty

Summary: Best-selling author and speaker Rick Kirschner did not know, until I told him, about the debate over the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine's decision to create a formal MD specialty in integrative medicine. For 25 years Kirschner has made his living through teaching communication and relationship strategies. He's written such books as How to Deal with Difficult People and, most recently, How to Click with People: The Secret to Better Relationships in Business and Life. Kirschner has skin in this game. A 1982 graduate of then National College of Naturopathic Medicine, Kirschner is a licensed but non-practicing doctor of naturopathic medicine. He'd heard from others about efforts of family practice docs, in a coincident irony, to keep naturopathic doctors from practicing at full scope. I asked Kirschner for his perspective on "clicking" in a context like this. Here is his column.
Send you comments to
for inclusion in a future Integrator Reader Forum.

Other articles in this series:

Rick Kirschner, ND: Author/speaker
Amidst the debate in these pages over the decision of the University of Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine to promote development of a recognized
MD specialty board in integrative medicine, I had unrelated reasons to connect with my friend and colleague of over 2 decades, Rick Kirschner, ND.

Kirschner is a best-selling author
and speaker to such groups as Toyota, the US Army and the Young President's Organization. He has made a living over the past 25 years through teaching communication and relationship strategies. In the mid-1980s, he co-authored a set of best-selling audio tapes, How to Deal with Difficult People, which offered lessons on communication in challenging situations. This was followed in the early 1990s by the international best-selling book, Dealing with People You Can't Stand: How to Bring Out the Best in People at Their Worst. Then came 7 more books, including his recent work on influences, "Insider's Guide to the Art of Persuasion." Some focused on people in workplaces, others in their families, and one with one's self. Kirschner's most recent is How to Click with People: The Secret to Better Relationships in Business and Life.

I shared with Kirschner my dismay that the antagonism between the integrative practice disciplines can still hit such a furious pitch as was the evident in the responses to the news. Kirschner shared that he had recently learned of the resolution from the American Academy of Family Physicians against full scope naturopathic practice such as is practiced in Kirschner's homestate of Oregon where he maintains a license.

I invited Kirschner, a non-practicing 1981 graduate of the then National College of Naturopathic Medicine to consider contributing his perspective. Learning to click seemed a good message for discomforted disciplines. Here is Kirschner's column.

Learning to "Click" Between the Disciplines

-- Rick Kirschner, ND
Author How to Click with People: The Secret to Better Relationships in Business and Life.

"Recently, I learned that some frustrated colleagues were talking about pursuing a public campaign to challenge the claim to authority of conventional medical doctors regarding ownership of the title of 'doctor.' 

Kirschner's business logo
"Their frustration is understandable.  Anyone who pays any attention to what is loosely categorized as 'alternative medicine' knows that there are legitimate grievances for practitioners of natural therapies.  I, too, would like to see things change, and I'm all in favor of developing strategy to bring about that change.  

"But what is the best strategy?  Maybe it's one that is done in the open, that invites other potential stakeholders to choose sides, but I don't think so.  The concern I have regarding this idea of a public campaign at this moment is that a direct and open challenge is probably the least effective response possible.  Because it's bound to be expensive, and it's bound to require bodies and minds willing to participate, and I just don't think there's enough of either to get it done this way.  So what possibility remains if we rule that out? 

    "When somebody doesn't make the choice
to talk to somebody who is opposing them,
I'm guessing it's a lack of confidence ..."

"More likely, strategies for further integrating healthcare and relieving harassment of natural medicine practitioners will, for the foreseeable future, be done behind closed doors and behind the scene, leveraging political networks and social capital for positive change.  And there's only one strategy that I'm certain about, and it's the personal one. 

"Whenever I hear that some natural medicine doctor is being sniped at by conventional docs to whom they've sent a referral, are being denied access to conventional med services on behalf of their patients, or are being brought up on charges by the conventional medical establishment due to a weak legal arrangement and overreach by practitioners, it occurs to me that the most obvious next step for the person seeking change is to reach out to the people engaged in the bad behavior, and find out what exactly is going on with them. 

"The fact is, people do what they do for a reason. Sometimes, lots of reasons.  People have their reasons, and if someone is doing things that interfere with you, a prudent choice is to attempt to find out what their reasons are.  That requires connecting, relating, and communicating purposefully and successfully with someone who, at the face of it, is hostile to you.  That hostility means they are protecting something they value, something they deem important.  And the deeper you go, the more meaningful it becomes, and the less effort is required for change.

"If really changing the health care paradigm
has even the remotest chance of success,
doctors must leave their silos, and start
clicking with people, start building
positive relationships."
"When somebody doesn't make the choice to talk to somebody who is opposing them in this way, I'm guessing it's a lack of confidence that is holding them back, along with a sense of isolation.   Otherwise, I think they would first reach out to the person calling them out, instead of hiring it out to attorneys. 

"Reaching out is the human thing to do when you're building bridges and knocking down walls. It is through our connections that we create healthy communities and alliances, by facing, surfacing and addressing problems when they arise.  And as things change, problems do arise. Whenever there's an interpersonal or interprofessional problem, finding out what the problem is has to be the top priority. 

"If someone feels under siege, and they're not thinking of finding out what's going on from the people besieging them, it likely means that they are uncomfortable with making contact and asking questions.  Perhaps they don't think they can stand up for what they're doing in a personal challenge, or perhaps they fear they're going to be lacking in some sort of comparison. I get it, that makes perfect sense.  I know that if I don't think I can hold my own on a subject, talking to someone about it in a respectful and authoritative way just isn't going to happen.  Most people are that way. 

"But avoidance is not an effective response when dealing with a challenge, not if progress and positive change are the desired result.  In other words, getting together with antagonists and talking about the antagonism and what's driving it has to happen.  I think that at least you have to try.  It demonstrates self respect.  It demonstrates integrity.  It very likely may create some trust, and a little trust is a great beginning.  

Click: Kirschner's most recent book
"If really changing the health care paradigm in this country has even the remotest chance of success, then I'm convinced that doctors must leave their silos, and start clicking with people, start building positive relationships.  Objections are not a bad thing.  Challenge is not a bad thing. Avoidance ought to be avoided, if at all possible.   Objections provide a profound opportunity to learn something about the deep structure of people who seem like your opponents.  Think about this.  If one of our elders was under attack, there's no doubt in my mind that they would pick up the phone and confront it by asking,  ‘What's going on?' 

"If someone is standing in your way, don't walk away, walk towards.  Embrace the opportunity of it.  And get clicking. Because time is passing, and the need for a paradigm shift has never been greater.  It is unlikely to happen because of a mass movement.  It is far more likely to happen in relationship, changing minds one at a time, until we reach a threshold of mutual understanding and respect.  It will happen through our relationships with other health care providers.  It will happen from the commitments we make.  It will happen one click at a time. And that time is now. 

"I'm reminded of the words of wisdom found for so many years on the Dr. Bronner's soap label:  'If not you, who?  If not now, when?'"


Comment: Kirschner's human and humane message can seem terribly naive amidst the vicious guild behavior in medicine. I think there is a place here to apply the therapeutic order, to use a concept expounded by Kirschner's discipline. By this I do not mean: Step 1: feel victimized. Step 2: sue the MFs.

Step one in these guild issues is optimally self-care in the form of meditation and reflection. The next move is meeting with the other. I agree with Kirschner that a lack of confidence is often in the way of communication. On all sides. Did the AAFP meet with the NDs before they passed a resolution against them? No one wants to expose their weaknesses or those of their own discipline. Each has them. Antagonistic parties have a great ability to spit out the history of the other's shadow. As Kirschner says: "It
demonstrates self respect.  It demonstrates integrity.  It very likely may create some trust, and a little trust is a great beginning."

I believe in steps of trust, even
itsy-bitsy ones, and in the planting of seeds even when the ground seems barren. Deserts sometimes bloom.

Later steps in the therapeutic order of political relationships represent the -ectomies of medicine. If the other does not respond reasonably and one is still threatened with senseless harm, more severe courses are asked. The courts are appropriate sometimes. Consider the opening to human discourse and integration forced by the very expensive Wilk vs. the AMA that put a muzzle on the AMA's efforts to kill chiropractic. Similarly, kudos to a group of family doctors that presently suing the federal government to break the stranglehold the AMA's specialists have on a health-focused reimbursement policy.

Here is my sense of the application of Kirschner's recommendation to the move by the Arizona Center. I have sought to model this in my management of the dialogue. Engage the issues. Put yourself in the other's shoes. For licensed chiropractors and naturopathic doctors who seem the most upset: Urge that the vision of these new MD-BCIM specialists include demonstrating expertise in how to work with integrative practitioners whose education in integrative approaches is deeper and more thorough than
is likely to be required of the MD-BCIM. Urge them to tilt the meaning of MD-BCIM away from know-it-all-do-it-all to a models steeped in interprofessional education and respect. Urge them to put this in training and the examination that leads to board certification. 
Start with the attempt to clarify and to click. Hope that Kirschner's wished for transformation of medicine, promised by the integrative MD community, manifests there.

Send you comments to
for inclusion in a future Integrator Reader Forum.

< Prev   Next >
Integrative Practitioner
The Westreich Foundation
voluntary contributions
Support the work!
All Integrator Round-ups
Integrator Top 10 Lists 2006-2015
Issues #140-#142 Oct-Dec 2015
Issues #137-#139 July-Sept 2015
Issues #134-#136 April-June 2015
Issues #131-#133 Jan-March 2015
Issues #127-#130 Sept-Dec 2014
Issues #123-#126 May-Aug 2014
Issues#119-#122 Jan-April 2014
Issues #116-#118 - Oct-Dec 2013
Issues #113-#115 July-Sept 2013
Issues #110-#112 April-June 2013
Issues #108-#109 Jan-March 2013
Issue #105-#107 Oct-Dec 2012
Issues #102-#104 - July-Sept 2012
Issues #99-#101 - April-June 2012
Issues #96-#98-Jan-March 2012
Issues #94-#95 Nov-Dec 2011
Issues #92-#93 Sept-Oct 2011
Issues #90 and #91 - July-Aug 2011
Issues #88 and #89 - May-June 2011
Issues #86 and #87 - March-April 2011
Issues #84 and #85 - Jan-Feb 2011
Issues #82 and #83 - Nov-Dec 2010
Issues #80 & #81 - Sept Oct 2010
Issues #78 & #79 - July August 2010
Issues #76 & #77 - May June 2010
Issues #74 & #75 - March-April 2010
Issues #73 & #73 - Jan-Feb 2010
Issues #69, #70 & #71 - Nov-Dec 2009
Issues #67 and #68 - Sept-Oct 2009
Issues #65 and #66 - July-August 2009
Issues #63-#64 - May-June 2009
Issues #60-#62 - March-April 2009
Issues #57-#59 - Jan-Feb 2009
Issues #55-#56 - Nov-Dec 2008
Issues #51-#54 - Sept-Oct 2008
Issues #47-#50 - July-August 2008
Issues #46 & -#47 - May-June 2008
Issues #43-#45 Mar-April 2008
Issues #41 & #42 - Feb 2008
Issues #39 & #40 - Dec-Jan '08
Issues #37 & #38 - Nov 2007
Issues #35 & #36 - Oct 2007
Issues #33 & #34 - Sept 2007
Issues #30-#32 - July-Aug 2007
Issues #28 & #29 - June 2007
Issues #26 and #27 - May 2007
Issue #25 - April 2007
Issues # 23 & #24 - March 2007
Issues #21 and #22 - Feb 2007
Issues #19 and & 20 - Jan 2007
Issues #17 and #18 - Dec 2006
Issues #15 and #16 - Nov 2006
Issues #13 and #14 - Oct 2006
Issues #11 and #12- Sept 2006
Issues #9 and #10 - Aug 2006
Issues #7 and #8 - July 2006
Issues #5 and #6 - June 2006
Issues #3 and #4 - May 2006
Issues #1 and #2 - April 2006
All Articles by Subject: 2006
All Articles by Subject: Jan-June 2007
IAYT-Sponsored Series on the Future of Yoga Therapy