background resources in PDF |
|
some CAM/IM publication links |
|
|
Joint Commission Issues New Pain Standards in Response to Integrative Medicine Team |
|
|
|
Written by John Weeks
|
Chronicles of Health Creation: Joint Commission Issues New Pain Standards in Response to Integrative Medicine Team[This article was first published here at the Huffington Post.]
A Nov. 12, 2014 announcement from the principal accrediting agency for health care organizations could significantly impact access to integrative pain care throughout the United States.
The agency is the Joint Commission. The revised accreditation standard
will apply to all the institutions under the agency's guidance and
review: hospitals, ambulatory care facilities, home health and senior
homes.
 Elevating non-pharmacologic approaches
The focus of the change is great news for integrative
health and medicine. The Joint Commission significantly elevated the
potential value of "non-pharmacologic" approaches. Among those options
directly called out are, in the terms used by the Joint Commission,
acupuncture therapy, massage therapy, chiropractic therapy, osteopathic
manipulative treatment, physical therapy, and relaxation therapy.
The
Joint Commission did not act in a vacuum. The action was prompted by an
April 2013 request for review of the pain management standard by a team
led by acupuncturis Arya Nielsen, Ph.D., Ac from the Department of
Integrative Medicine at Mount Sinai Beth Israel. The team subsequently
provided consultation and support for the Joint Commission's
investigation.
The full story of the collaboration speaks to the power
of two impassioned individuals backed by their health care organization
plus the well-utilized muscle of the growing Consortium of Academic
Health Centers for Integrative Medicine.
The effort began with a recollection of Nielsen. She recalled reading nearly 15 years earlier in the Integrator for the Business of Alternative Medicine
that the Joint Commission had vaguely referenced non-pharmacological
approaches in a 2000 pain standard. The intervening period had been
robust for acupuncture research. Wasn't it time, Nielsen reasoned, for taking another look?
 Nielsen: researcher acupuncturist stimulates the action
Nielsen
is director of the Acupuncture Fellowship for Inpatient Care at Mount
Sinai Beth Israel Hospital. She took a comprehensive literature review
she'd presented at a hospital grand rounds to Ben Kilgler, M.D., MPH,
vice chair of the hospital's Department of Integrative Medicine. Kligler
happened also at that time to be the chair of the above-mentioned
Consortium.
Two excellent suggestions emerged. First, why not
open the query to the Joint Commission to a range of non-pharmacologic
approaches rather than just acupuncture? The interval since the 2000
standard almost precisely coincided with the era of research funding by
the NIH National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
following its creation in 1998. Studies funded by this agency alone
vastly expanded the science on multiple non-drug approaches.
Nielsen
and Marsha J. Handel, MLS, the department's informatics lead, submitted
a literature review of acupuncture therapy for pain. A subsequent
review was submitted for massage therapy with assistance of
researcher-massage therapist Janet Kahn, Ph.D., LMT from the University
of Vermont College of Medicine. The Nielsen-Handel team also submitted a
review of studies of relaxation therapy.
 Kligler: suggests CAHCIM support
Second, why not ask
those members of the consortium of medical schools with integrative
programs who wished to do so to co-sign a request that the Joint
Commission revise the standard. This could add a measure of gravitas.
Twenty chose to do so. They spoke to the significant opioid abuse problem in the United States
and the typical lack of treatment options given patients despite the
mounting research supporting integrative therapies and practitioners in
pain treatment.
The door opened at the Joint Commission. Nielsen
subsequently served on a January 2014 stakeholder panel of pain medicine
specialists throughout the US that was tasked to help the Joint
Commission revise the standard.
The beauty in the language of the
revised standard is the side-by-side placement of "non-pharmacologic"
and "pharmacologic" approaches. In fact, the non-pharma options are
listed first. While this order was likely for alphabetical reasons, it
follows a proper therapeutic order in which less-invasive approaches are considered first.
 20 members sign petitioning letter to Joint Commission
Accreditation
insiders will note that the revised pain standard does not have the
full police force the Joint Commission can put behind an action.
Hospitals and clinics will not be "scored" on their compliance. Thus the
move is seen more as a carrot that empowers integrative interests
rather than a stick to force integrative pain treatment among the
reluctant.
Notably however, in their statement on the revision,
the Joint Commission specifically asked that "when considering the use
of medications to treat pain, organizations should consider both the
benefits to the patient, as well as the risks of dependency, addiction,
and abuse of opioids." The admonition helps tee up exploration of other
options.
Gratitude in this time of giving thanks. Credit the
Joint Commission for its responsiveness. Credit Nielsen for seeing the
opportunity and doing the major work, with Handel, to create the case as
the core Mount Sinai Beth Israel team. Credit Kilgler and the
Consortium of Academic Health Centers for speaking up for the need for
change.
The new standards will bring patient care a step closer to a "Never Only Opioids" era, blogged about here on HuffPost,
that can help us undo the present harm to human beings, families and
communities from unnecessary use, and overuse, of prescription
pain-killers.
|
|
|